Lately, huge concern
came about because of the global warming theory based on carbon dioxide
in the atmosphere. This pages will show (through logic and physics) how
climate changes, great and small, are taking place. Theentire thing is
extremely simple. I will do my best to concentrate the whole thing as
plainly and easily as is possible in these few pages.
Today, the axis’ tilt is at about a 23½ degree inclination; let’s round it up to 24°. It must be understood by everyone who reads this article that the seasons on Earth are imposed by this inclination. Anyone who doesn’t have the full grasp of this knowledge should check on internet for it.
Due to this 24° inclination, we have a rainy season during three quarters of the year and a snowy season in winter at parallels 45° and the areas we call “temperate climates”.
The tropics are at parallel 24° respectively. The Tropic of Cancer is located the furthest north at parallel 24° in the northern hemisphere, and Capricorn is at parallel 24° in the southern hemisphere. The main storms occur in the oceans between the tropics; hence the term “tropical storms”. In summertime, water comes down as rain all over the world and flows into rivers, and from rivers to the sea, and then to the oceans. More water evaporates and more rain comes and goes back to the seas.
In wintertime, precipitation comes and stays at temperate climates and above as snow. It has no choice. It remains as snow until spring and summer comes and melts it away. The melting snow goes back to the sea and the cycle starts again. I hope it’s understood that the cycle—seawater, vapor, rain, rivers, and sea again—is interrupted temporarily in wintertime on parts of the earth from parallel 40° or so to the poles. Water is locked up as snow in those parts of the globe during winter.
Now imagine that by some miracle the earth’s axis tilt is changed from what we have today to an almost perfectly straight position. No visible axis inclination at all. There would be only one tropic located at the equator and there would be no more equinoxes or solstices. The sun would rise at exactly the same point and time every morning. The precipitation above parallels 45° would come down as snow and stay there as long as the axis stays in that position. It wouldn’t melt anymore, because there would be no more seasons. As the waters past parallels 45° keep coming down as snow for tens of thousands of years (or millions) and keep accumulating there, logically, the oceans would go lower and lower. Isn’t that exactly what scientists are telling us?
They clearly say that ocean water was locked up past parallels 45° during an Ice Age. They claim (foolishly) that the earth “cooled off” for some reason (they didn’t quite figure out how yet) and that was the reason for the Ice Age.
But if we cool off the temperature all over earth by 10 degrees Fahrenheit, we still wouldn’t have a glacier line going around the earth at 45 parallel, because the seasons on earth don’t allow that. If we cool it by 20 or 30 degrees, we’d have some sort of glacier line, but it would be very inclined, crossing 24 parallels, not the almost perfect glacier line at parallel 45° we had during the last Ice Age.
Then, of course, comes the question: how does one cool off the earth by 20 or 30 degrees and then warm it up again to a wonderful life-sustaining climate and never go over 100 degrees worm up over the normal? It’s impossible. Yes, the earth could be cooled off by 20 or 30 or 80 degrees for many reasons, but it would not warm up again to sustaining life in cycles with Ice Ages and Subtropical vegetation in Alaska and other forms of climate—all of them sustaining life the way it did.
Great animal extinctions occurred on earth, but there was never an “extinction of life” period. This means only one thing: climate changes on earth, but only to certain degrees and in certain areas. The climate never changed to the point of extinguishing all life on earth. And according to my concept, it never will unless some total destruction comes, because it can’t.
Here’s how it happens:
There is no global warming and it never existed. Nor did “cooling of the earth” ever occur to create ice ages. What we had and have constantly is climate change, which happens due to the changing tilt of the earth’s axis. As the position of the axis changes, so does the climate. The entire thing is a matter of logic and is extremely simple: when the earth has a perfect vertical axis (0° inclination) we have a total ice age.
In that situation, the tropic (there is only one) is exactly on the equator and all the precipitation passing the 45° parallels, north or south, will fall as snow and stay there as long as the axis stays in that position.
When the globe’s axis is at 90°, there is also a single tropic which cuts through the poles in the middle and crosses the equator at a 90° angle. Only God knows how climate on earth would be in such a situation. It would be scorching with constant daylight at one pole for half the year and freezing solid and dark the other half. The equinoxes will not be discussed here. The axis positions presented above are the most extreme and earth probably never had such an ideal position of the axis. Any position in between, we call “inclination”.
Today, we have an approximate 24° inclination, which makes an excellent compromise between the 0° and 45° possibilities, because it is almost in the middle. At a 45° inclination, the tropic would be at parallel 45° and the climate on earth would be very wet with no snow at the poles. Distance between the tropics would double.
So far so good, but how does the earth change its axis position? The answer is a matter of physics and is just as simple: when the earth has great eruptions or earthquakes, it changes its axis position in a minuscule way—creating small climate changes. Big changes of the axis position and great climate changes occur when celestial collisions take place.
If a massive asteroid like the one that hit the Yucatan 65,000,000 years ago hits earth, it would definitely roll the earth over and the position the earth stops at, becomes the new axis inclination. That new inclination imposes the new climate on earth. Dinosaurs disappeared after that collision, because the climate changed so much so quickly that no adaptation time existed. Blaming dust for the dinosaur’s extinction is based on pure ignorance.
The mini axis position changes are created by the earth itself because of the moon’s attraction. The moon’s attraction creates pressure, friction, and movement of the tectonic plates on earth, which in turn creates internal heat, which melts stuff inside—creating pressure—which in turn creates eruptions. During an eruption, Isaac Newton’s explanation (every action has an equal and opposite reaction) takes place and while the erupted material goes into the sky (action) the other half of the energy (reaction) pushes against the earth and something has to move. That movement is the changing of the axis’ position if the location and eruption or earthquake is strong enough. When that happens, mini climate changes take place. This constant mini axis-changing position is extremely important for keeping the earth “alive”.
Lately, theoretical scientists have made the connection between more-than-usual carbon dioxide amounts in the atmosphere and a “warmer” climate on earth (and vice versa). In other words, when an ice age occurs there is less carbon dioxide in the air. This is the base for their “global warming or cooling effect”. They’ve got something here, but as usual they have it in reverse. According to them, the amount of carbon dioxide increased and that created “global warming”. And then the carbon dioxide somehow disappeared from the atmosphere and that created the “cooling of the earth”. I understand how carbon dioxide can increase by a great eruption or chain of eruptions, but how do you remove carbon dioxide from air? Here is the real connection between ice ages and more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere:
When there is a tilt position of 45 degrees, or close to it, the distance between the tropics is double of what we have today at 24 degrees and there are far more winds and water currents and rain. There is no snow on earth, nor any deserts. That is when dinosaurs lived in Alaska. Vegetation is abundant all over the earth and that’s where the extra carbon dioxide comes from. All that vegetation uses carbon from air and soil, and when it decomposes the carbon dioxide goes into the atmosphere. Part of the vegetation trapped into the soil returns the carbon that came from the soil to its origin. But animals eating the vegetation create much carbon dioxide by excreting that vegetation and in the same time fertilize the soil, which in turn creates more vegetation.
When an ice age is imposed on the globe by the change of tilt, the vegetative area on earth is greatly diminished. So is the animal reduction. Much less vegetation decomposes and because much of the animal life has been eradicated suddenly the excess carbon dioxide is removed by flora, little by little, from the atmosphere. There is some other fact which explains the reduction of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, but I don’t know what that is. But the formula is simple: more vegetation on earth, more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. The less vegetation there is, the less carbon dioxide.
Therefore, it’s not that carbon dioxide built up and “warms up” the globe, but rather that the globe had its inclination changed (for one reason or another) and if the tilt increased, so did the vegetation and number of animals as well as the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
If the axis’ tilt decreased to an ice age inclination, which is from about 15 degrees to zero, plants and animals are limited to a small belt below parallel 45° and mostly in the northern hemisphere, because it would be mostly water in the southern part of the globe in that area. Once the number of plants and animals decreased, so did the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
Once the concept of the axis’ change and its relationship with climate change is understood everything will be figured out, because it’s all related. The animal extinction that followed the end of the last ice age makes a lot of sense to me, only because I completely understand the reason for it and how the ice age ended.
The sequence of the last ice age is this.
Comet or asteroid hit earth, the axis tilt changed to the approximate 24° we have today, immense air turbulence took place and therefore great rains, glaciers started melting immediately (if it was summer) and flooded everything. Animals and humans drowned all over the earth, some to immediate extinction and some survivors starved or died of diseases later. Only the luckiest and toughest survived.
We don’t have much evidence of human life before the great flood in Europe and America, because everything was washed down and covered by the moving waters of the “Great Flood” which fallowed. America was much more severely affected than Europe by the Great Flood.
Today, the axis’ tilt is at about a 23½ degree inclination; let’s round it up to 24°. It must be understood by everyone who reads this article that the seasons on Earth are imposed by this inclination. Anyone who doesn’t have the full grasp of this knowledge should check on internet for it.
Due to this 24° inclination, we have a rainy season during three quarters of the year and a snowy season in winter at parallels 45° and the areas we call “temperate climates”.
The tropics are at parallel 24° respectively. The Tropic of Cancer is located the furthest north at parallel 24° in the northern hemisphere, and Capricorn is at parallel 24° in the southern hemisphere. The main storms occur in the oceans between the tropics; hence the term “tropical storms”. In summertime, water comes down as rain all over the world and flows into rivers, and from rivers to the sea, and then to the oceans. More water evaporates and more rain comes and goes back to the seas.
In wintertime, precipitation comes and stays at temperate climates and above as snow. It has no choice. It remains as snow until spring and summer comes and melts it away. The melting snow goes back to the sea and the cycle starts again. I hope it’s understood that the cycle—seawater, vapor, rain, rivers, and sea again—is interrupted temporarily in wintertime on parts of the earth from parallel 40° or so to the poles. Water is locked up as snow in those parts of the globe during winter.
Now imagine that by some miracle the earth’s axis tilt is changed from what we have today to an almost perfectly straight position. No visible axis inclination at all. There would be only one tropic located at the equator and there would be no more equinoxes or solstices. The sun would rise at exactly the same point and time every morning. The precipitation above parallels 45° would come down as snow and stay there as long as the axis stays in that position. It wouldn’t melt anymore, because there would be no more seasons. As the waters past parallels 45° keep coming down as snow for tens of thousands of years (or millions) and keep accumulating there, logically, the oceans would go lower and lower. Isn’t that exactly what scientists are telling us?
They clearly say that ocean water was locked up past parallels 45° during an Ice Age. They claim (foolishly) that the earth “cooled off” for some reason (they didn’t quite figure out how yet) and that was the reason for the Ice Age.
But if we cool off the temperature all over earth by 10 degrees Fahrenheit, we still wouldn’t have a glacier line going around the earth at 45 parallel, because the seasons on earth don’t allow that. If we cool it by 20 or 30 degrees, we’d have some sort of glacier line, but it would be very inclined, crossing 24 parallels, not the almost perfect glacier line at parallel 45° we had during the last Ice Age.
Then, of course, comes the question: how does one cool off the earth by 20 or 30 degrees and then warm it up again to a wonderful life-sustaining climate and never go over 100 degrees worm up over the normal? It’s impossible. Yes, the earth could be cooled off by 20 or 30 or 80 degrees for many reasons, but it would not warm up again to sustaining life in cycles with Ice Ages and Subtropical vegetation in Alaska and other forms of climate—all of them sustaining life the way it did.
Great animal extinctions occurred on earth, but there was never an “extinction of life” period. This means only one thing: climate changes on earth, but only to certain degrees and in certain areas. The climate never changed to the point of extinguishing all life on earth. And according to my concept, it never will unless some total destruction comes, because it can’t.
Here’s how it happens:
There is no global warming and it never existed. Nor did “cooling of the earth” ever occur to create ice ages. What we had and have constantly is climate change, which happens due to the changing tilt of the earth’s axis. As the position of the axis changes, so does the climate. The entire thing is a matter of logic and is extremely simple: when the earth has a perfect vertical axis (0° inclination) we have a total ice age.
In that situation, the tropic (there is only one) is exactly on the equator and all the precipitation passing the 45° parallels, north or south, will fall as snow and stay there as long as the axis stays in that position.
When the globe’s axis is at 90°, there is also a single tropic which cuts through the poles in the middle and crosses the equator at a 90° angle. Only God knows how climate on earth would be in such a situation. It would be scorching with constant daylight at one pole for half the year and freezing solid and dark the other half. The equinoxes will not be discussed here. The axis positions presented above are the most extreme and earth probably never had such an ideal position of the axis. Any position in between, we call “inclination”.
Today, we have an approximate 24° inclination, which makes an excellent compromise between the 0° and 45° possibilities, because it is almost in the middle. At a 45° inclination, the tropic would be at parallel 45° and the climate on earth would be very wet with no snow at the poles. Distance between the tropics would double.
So far so good, but how does the earth change its axis position? The answer is a matter of physics and is just as simple: when the earth has great eruptions or earthquakes, it changes its axis position in a minuscule way—creating small climate changes. Big changes of the axis position and great climate changes occur when celestial collisions take place.
If a massive asteroid like the one that hit the Yucatan 65,000,000 years ago hits earth, it would definitely roll the earth over and the position the earth stops at, becomes the new axis inclination. That new inclination imposes the new climate on earth. Dinosaurs disappeared after that collision, because the climate changed so much so quickly that no adaptation time existed. Blaming dust for the dinosaur’s extinction is based on pure ignorance.
The mini axis position changes are created by the earth itself because of the moon’s attraction. The moon’s attraction creates pressure, friction, and movement of the tectonic plates on earth, which in turn creates internal heat, which melts stuff inside—creating pressure—which in turn creates eruptions. During an eruption, Isaac Newton’s explanation (every action has an equal and opposite reaction) takes place and while the erupted material goes into the sky (action) the other half of the energy (reaction) pushes against the earth and something has to move. That movement is the changing of the axis’ position if the location and eruption or earthquake is strong enough. When that happens, mini climate changes take place. This constant mini axis-changing position is extremely important for keeping the earth “alive”.
Lately, theoretical scientists have made the connection between more-than-usual carbon dioxide amounts in the atmosphere and a “warmer” climate on earth (and vice versa). In other words, when an ice age occurs there is less carbon dioxide in the air. This is the base for their “global warming or cooling effect”. They’ve got something here, but as usual they have it in reverse. According to them, the amount of carbon dioxide increased and that created “global warming”. And then the carbon dioxide somehow disappeared from the atmosphere and that created the “cooling of the earth”. I understand how carbon dioxide can increase by a great eruption or chain of eruptions, but how do you remove carbon dioxide from air? Here is the real connection between ice ages and more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere:
When there is a tilt position of 45 degrees, or close to it, the distance between the tropics is double of what we have today at 24 degrees and there are far more winds and water currents and rain. There is no snow on earth, nor any deserts. That is when dinosaurs lived in Alaska. Vegetation is abundant all over the earth and that’s where the extra carbon dioxide comes from. All that vegetation uses carbon from air and soil, and when it decomposes the carbon dioxide goes into the atmosphere. Part of the vegetation trapped into the soil returns the carbon that came from the soil to its origin. But animals eating the vegetation create much carbon dioxide by excreting that vegetation and in the same time fertilize the soil, which in turn creates more vegetation.
When an ice age is imposed on the globe by the change of tilt, the vegetative area on earth is greatly diminished. So is the animal reduction. Much less vegetation decomposes and because much of the animal life has been eradicated suddenly the excess carbon dioxide is removed by flora, little by little, from the atmosphere. There is some other fact which explains the reduction of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, but I don’t know what that is. But the formula is simple: more vegetation on earth, more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. The less vegetation there is, the less carbon dioxide.
Therefore, it’s not that carbon dioxide built up and “warms up” the globe, but rather that the globe had its inclination changed (for one reason or another) and if the tilt increased, so did the vegetation and number of animals as well as the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
If the axis’ tilt decreased to an ice age inclination, which is from about 15 degrees to zero, plants and animals are limited to a small belt below parallel 45° and mostly in the northern hemisphere, because it would be mostly water in the southern part of the globe in that area. Once the number of plants and animals decreased, so did the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
Once the concept of the axis’ change and its relationship with climate change is understood everything will be figured out, because it’s all related. The animal extinction that followed the end of the last ice age makes a lot of sense to me, only because I completely understand the reason for it and how the ice age ended.
The sequence of the last ice age is this.
Comet or asteroid hit earth, the axis tilt changed to the approximate 24° we have today, immense air turbulence took place and therefore great rains, glaciers started melting immediately (if it was summer) and flooded everything. Animals and humans drowned all over the earth, some to immediate extinction and some survivors starved or died of diseases later. Only the luckiest and toughest survived.
We don’t have much evidence of human life before the great flood in Europe and America, because everything was washed down and covered by the moving waters of the “Great Flood” which fallowed. America was much more severely affected than Europe by the Great Flood.
No comments:
Post a Comment