Friday, July 27, 2012

Vote John Swasey Duchesne County Commissioner

I also want to encourage voters to vote for John Swasey. Both Republicans and Democrats are for big government and neither are willing to stand up against the public opinion of the nanny state.

Today's Democratic party is not your grandma's democratic party. Today's democratic platform is identical to the Luciferian Creed. That said, the people with powers above the President of the United States (Bilderbergs, George Soros, Illuminati, et. al.), provide funding for both political parties and there is now little difference between the two parties. Voting a third party is our only chance to get a candidate that has not been bought and paid for in advance.

The fact that Duchesne County was ordered to pay $3.5 million for blatant discrimination against the handicapped, should be a sign that the County's disdain for both the handicapped and small business must end now! The money that the Duchesne County Commissioners wasted could have paid 1,000 families, $3,500.00 each. Talk about waste! And this is just one incident.

The County also has an extreme bias against the residents that live out of town. The County has all but made mobile homes illegal. There are bans on trailer parks and man camps. Duchesne County even withholds an address from residents that live in a mobile home. Mike Hyde illegally tried to get my Post Office Box revoked and has coerced the Post Office to illegally withhold boxes from residents that live in a mobile home. Even though hundreds of existing mobile homes have addresses. By illegally withholding an address, the County intends to punish residents by making it impossible to receive FedEx and UPS packages.

When we allow our small town government to become evil, our national leadership becomes evil. It is clear to me and several million others that our national leadership is beyond corrupt. It is guided by Satan. Our local leadership is against all of the freedoms that made this country great. In many cases, our local authorities act as cowards, enacting laws just because a large corrupt city like Chicago did, rather than thinking for themselves and acting as representatives of the people. The idiotic fireworks ban is an example of this. Banning fires at the Starvation State Park campground is another example of stupidity.

We MUST vote for a third party. A man that respects the United States Constitution and will fight for private property rights. Any other vote is doing exactly what one third of heaven did when they chose to follow Lucifer.

Monday, July 23, 2012

Opting in to the Constitution

Opting in to the Constitution

My thoughts posted on a thread in the LDS Liberty Google group:
I think that the closest thing that our system USED to have that resembles a periodic covenant is through the mechanism of voting as it used to take place.
when a voter filled a ballot, it was NOT a secret ballot, so therefore it was a legal instrument transferring representative authority from the voter to the candidate, that is assuming that the candidate won.
Since secret ballots came in at the turn of last century or so, there is no paper trail of these legal instruments proving the authority of representation by the representative of the voters who elected him.
In the old way of doing it, voters who felt that their rights were violated had the theoretical ability to sue the people who elected the representative.  So, if you elected a bad person, you may get a bill in the mail which is your share of the damages owed to the people who won the suit.
Now, does this bring EVERYONE into the system, if they voted? I dunno.  It’s the only mechanism that I can think of.
I don’t think that citizenship should be given, and that taxation should be levied on every person in the nation.
If voting and assigning representative authority involves on in the system and *IF* taxes should exist, they should only be paid by those who participate in the voting system…IMO.
IMO, if you don’t pay taxes you shouldn’t vote and if you don’t vote, you shouldn’t pay taxes and if you don’t do either, then you aren’t a citizen.  However, that does not mean that a-non citizen, or denizen can be trodden upon and have rights violated, for RIGHTS are universal to ALL people. The difference between a citizen and denizen consists of privileges afforded to the one that are not given to the other because the other doesn’t participate or pay the price.
The world in which citizenship privileges and obligations aren’t forced upon everyone universally is one in which people are free to play in the system or be out of it and still have peace reign.
That it this world:
D&C 134:5 “We believe that all men are bound to sustain and uphold the respective governments in which they reside, while protected in their inherent and inalienable rights by the laws of such governments . . . . “
So once everyone’s rights are protected, people are free to live like a bunch of Mormons building the city of Zion, or a bunch or anarcho-capitalists, lone hillbillies, communists, etc.
I think that if inalienable rights ARE protected, then rebellion is unbecoming, but since they aren’t, many of us are involved in a peaceful rebellion of ideas, to wake up as many people as possible.
I think that if all rights were protected by this constitutional system, then there wouldn’t be people agitating for NO government at all, because all that is in response to a mindset that NO government can, by the fact that it exists and is, protect rights unless they are taken away. It’s a theoretical non-starter to cause the usurpation of rights in the name of protecting them.
Government usurps rights in the name of protecting them and in the name of welfare by taxing EVERYONE by assuming that they are all in this system by virtue of their birth (or presence) and calling them citizens thereby….letting government employees (who don’t pay taxes) to vote, letting those who receive welfare (which they shouldn’t from the govt) to vote, and erasing the instrument of authority and hence accountability that ties the voter to the representative.
When/IF, government returns to it original moorings and people discard the mechanisms that cause evil in this society, all people who have complaints about it, will have cause to admit that the constitution was inspired, I think.
I think that the mandate of those who believe this, is to call for such a paring down of government that all others who eschew the whole institution in and of itself …and eschew the constitution, will not call for it’s complete dissolution.
Of course, in my mind, the reason for doing this is not a big “i-told-you-so”.  I want to see and be a part of building Zion. I don’t think that Zion would/could/will be built under current circumstances.
The other reason that I defer my reasoning as a latter-day saint skeptic of government, is the presence of prophecies that have been oft-repeated by modern prophets.  Latter-day Saints will be pivotal in bearing this constitution away from oblivion. I don’t know the circumstances surrounding this nor the state of this country as it happens. As a latter-day saint I have to believe it when a seer says that something will happen. If they say that it will happen and that the members of the church shall be part of it, then I want to do what I can to get other LDS people to hasten this to come about.

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

The Case for Secret Combinations

--By Ken Bowers

Many people find it hard to believe in the idea of a conspiracy, especially one that is pervasive, world wide and all encompassing. Even members of the LDS Church find it hard to grasp that our society could possibly be ‘controlled’ by some secretive group. It doesn’t seem possible when we travel, vote, express our opinions openly, worship as we please and seem to lead lives that are largely uncontrolled. But the General Authorities of the Church say differently. For instance, Ezra Taft Benson said:
I testify that wickedness is more highly organized, more cleverly disguised, and more powerfully promoted than ever before. Secret combinations lusting for power, gain, and glory are flourishing. A secret combination that seeks to overthrow the freedom of all lands, nations, and countries is increasing its evil influence and control over America and the entire world.(Ezra Taft Benson, “I Testify,” General Conference, October 1988, reported in Ensign, Nov. 1988, p. 87)
President Benson testified that a secret combination has control over America and the entire world. That goes contrary to what we are used to thinking. How can it be that we are controlled when we think we are free? Is President Benson’s view just an aberration, or is it shared with other General Authorities? Here is a quotation from Joseph Fielding Smith:
Satan has control now. No matter where you look, he is in controleven in our own land. He is guiding the governments as far as the Lord will permit him. That is why there is so much strife, turmoil, confusion all over the earth. One master mind is governing the nations. It is not the President of the United States; it is not Hitler; it is not Mussolini; it is not the king or government of England or any other land; it is Satan himself. (Joseph Fielding Smith Jr.,Doctrines of Salvation, Vol. 3, p.314-315)
How can that be possible? The answer is that this secret combination doesn’t have total control, but effective control. That means that they do not control our every action, as in Stalin’s Soviet Union; they control the direction our world moves in by controlling what we see and hear in the news media, the educational establishment, and the major political parties. Here are some quotations to prove this idea:
One of our best-kept secrets is the degree to which a handful of huge corporations control the flow of information in the United States. Whether it is television, radio, newspapers, magazines, books or the Internet, a few giant conglomerates are determining what we see, hear and read.(Rep. Bernie Sanders)
And this:
Our job is to give people not what they want, but what we decide they ought to have. (Richard Salent, former president, CBS News)
And this:
In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interest, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press . . . They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers.
An agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers . . . This policy also included the suppression of everything in opposition to the wishes of the interests served . . . (U.S. Congressman Oscar Calloway, The Congressional Record, February 9, 1917, Vol. 54, pp. 2947-2948)
The proof of media bias and brainwashing is substantial. One has to look for it, because the truth is deliberately buried by the media itself. Here are some quotations about our educational establishment:
The aim of public education is not to spread enlightenment at all; it is simply to reduce as many individuals as possible to the same safe level, to breed and train a standardized citizenry, to down dissent and originality. That is its aim in the United States, whatever the pretensions of politicians, pedagogues, and other such mountebanks, and that is its aim everywhere else . . . Their purpose, in brief, is to make docile and patriotic citizens, to pile up majorities, and to make John Doe and Richard Doe as nearly alike, in their everyday reactions and ways of thinking, as possible. (H. L. Mencken)
The article goes on to say: “Dodd has advised his House committee employers to bear down upon evidence that grants, made chiefly by the Carnegie and Rockefeller foundations, were used toward‘directing education toward an international viewpoint and discrediting the traditions to which it had been dedicated, changing both school and college curricula to the point where they sometimes denied principles underlying the American way of life . . . ’”
(John O’Donnell, “Capitol Stuff,” From an article in the Daily News, May 12, 1954)
Again, the evidence for the educational brainwashing of our children is found in many other quotations. But surely, one may say, that does not include our major political parties? The answer is found in the following quotations that show the control of the Republicans and Democrats:
Usually, carefully screened leading “actors” are picked well in advance of election day by a small group, picked for both major parties, thereby reducing the promotional risk to just about zero.
On the political stage, one must be groomed by “backers” to become a “statesman.” It is desirable for such a candidate to have great personal ambition and, perchance, to be vulnerable to blackmail for some past occurrences; hence, someone not apt to become too independent in time, but always amenable to “suggestions” on the policy level. (Curtis Dall, FDR: My Exploited Father-in-Law, p. 23)
Curtis Dall was the son-in-law of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. He saw what happened in FDR’s White House and was appalled at it. But he is far from the only witness to control from behind the scenes:
From 1936 through 1960 the Republican presidential nominee was selected by a small group of secret kingmakers who are the most powerful opinion makers in the world. They dictated the choice of the Republican presidential nominee just as completely as the Paris dressmakers control the length of women’s skirts. (Phyllis Schlafly, A Choice Not an Echo, p. 6)
Or this:
To Morgan, all political parties were simply organizations to be used, and the firm always was careful to keep a foot in all camps. Morgan himself, Dwight Morrow, and other partners were allied with the Republicans; Russell C. Leffingwell was allied with the Democrats; Grayson Murphy was allied with the extreme Right; and Thomas W. Lamont was allied with the Left . . . To this same seminal figure, (Morgan), may be attributed the use of tax-exempt foundations forcontrolling these activities . . . (Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, p. 945)
This behind the scenes manipulation of both political parties is also very well attested. These days, one must really dig to find the truth. The control of our lives also includes our national finances through the agency of the Federal Reserve System, which is a private, stock-owned banking cartel which enriches itself while making the rest of us poor. They do that through inflation that comes about through fractional reserve banking. Here are some quotations that establish that fact:
This Act, [Federal Reserve Act of 1913,] established the most gigantic trust on earth. When the President signs this bill, the invisible government by the Monetary Power will be legalized . . . The greatest crime of Congress is its currency system. The worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetuated by this banking bill. The caucus and party bosses have again operated and prevented the people from getting the benefit of their own government. (Charles A. Lindberg to the House of Representatives, December 23, 1913)
Or this:
MR. SPEAKER: Our government debt at this time is approximately $50 billion. By the time that it’s paid, it will aggregate $100 billion . . . The amount of 100 percent is due to the interest charges . . . I have never yet had anyone who could . . . justify the federal government borrowing the use of its own money . . . I believe the time will come when people will demand that this be changed . . . [and] they will actually blame . . . Congress for sitting idly by and permitting such an idiotic system to continue. I have talked to the secretary of the Treasury and members of the Federal Reserve Board . . . They know this can be done easily and conveniently and will save money . . . the Federal Reserve Bank System . . . is not owned by the government.. Many people think that it is because it says “Federal Reserve.” It belongs to private banks, private corporations. So we have farmed out to the Federal Reserve Banking System . . .the privilege of issuing the government’s money! (Rep. Wright Patman, House, Sept. 29, 1941, Congressional Record, p. 7583)
Or this:
We have two governments in Washington: one run by the elected people–which is a minor part–and one run by the moneyed interests, which control everything. (Congressman C. Wright Patman, Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee, quoted by Studs Terkel in Hard Times, New York: The New Press, 2005, pp. 284-285)
So the idea of a conspiracy owning our government is not some half-baked crazy idea. There is hard evidence demonstrating the fact of control from behind the scenes. Nevertheless, many still scoff at the idea and dismiss it without even consulting the evidence. They just can’t believe such a thing possible. J. Edgar Hoover said:
The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.
Unfortunately, denying the existence of a conspiracy does not make it go away. Perhaps people would just prefer to think that everything is rosy and if they put on horse’s blinders, there won’t be an 800 pound gorilla named ‘conspiracy’ sitting in the corner of the room. But that is not a good attitude to have. We have to wake up and see things for what they really are.

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Why anti-Christ, devil worshippers, and liberals hate labels

Wouldn't it be wonderful if everyone had a label right on their shirt?  Life would be grand!  We would know right away if the person was a child molester, bank robber, raper, liberal, muslim, or whatever.

Breeds of humans, like breeds of dogs, have different capabilities that are genetically impossible to ignore.  You probably won't find many poodles as police or attack dogs.  Likewise, with humans, you do not expect a Mexican to invent anything.  On the other hand, Mexicans make extremely good workers, and are often found harvesting fruits and vegetables.

Satanists are against freedom.  Christians are for freedom.  The only real difference between Jesus and Lucifer is their view on free agency.  The followers of Jesus opted for freedom of choice.  The followers of Lucifer opted for a safety net so that there would be no failure, but everyone would succeed in returning to heaven.  Lucifer could best be described as a democrat, liberal, or for having more hatred for freedom than any entity in the universe.  These are the facts, and anyone with a different point of view is either a liar or incredibly stupid, or both.   

Satanists, or Lucifarians do not want us to label things as they really are because normal people would be offended and the spread of Marxism, socialism, communism, Satanism, etc. would not be as easy.  Normally, a person would not intentionally drink from a bottle labeled "poison."  Although in the case of cigarettes, the label is often ignored.  Who would become an alcoholic if the label on the bottle said "will destroy your relationships, make you act like an idiot, destroy brain cells, and harm your unborn child?"   Now when "whores" (another label) want to murder their unborn children, the Lucifarian at Planned Parenthood do not let the young mother seen the face of the unborn child or even an ultra-sound.  The girl is told that she has "freedom of choice" and she is simply eliminating a fetus.  Some evil, liar, bitch, told the girl that the fetus is part of her body and therefore she can cut it out if she wants.  The truth is that women do not have a penis and so a male child is not a part of the woman's body but a body of it's own.  By labeling the murder as an option, it sounds so much better.

Democrats change the meaning of words and especially labels.  For instance, most universities have an area set aside where people can practice "free speech."  People with brains or people that are not inherently evil want freedom of speech everywhere, not in a small fenced off area. 

Labels are a wonderful thing and anyone that doesn't like labels is by definition "evil."  We learned as children that sticks and stones can break our bones but words can never hurt us.  This is 100% true but evil people don't want us to label things the way they actually are because it will make the spread of evil more difficult.

We all know for a certainty that Muslims are the only ones that hijack airplanes.  Of course, if we only profile towel heads, the Muslims will hire a different idealogy to do their evil work.  Even so, a normal person will be more alert if seated next to a Muslim on an aircraft.

Evil people hate individualism.  They want every child in school to be equal.  If a smart kid does extremely well and never has homework, he is not encouraged.  If an illegal alien that can't even speak the language, lets stinky taco farts and waves a Mexican flag, he is passed to the next grade even though he is not as smart as a first grader.

Some of us are pretty or handsome.  Some of us are flat ugly.  Equality is stupid to even think about.  Yet liberals want the government to make everyone equal.  This is totally against God and Nature.  Should pretty people be required to slash their face with a knife to leave a nasty scar?  This is precisely what taking rich peoples money to give to the lazy is all about. 

Black people when left to their own devices as is the case in Africa, have many limitations.  Every medical student knows for a fact that black brains weigh less and are smaller.  SAT scores have proven that black people are simply not as smart.  Anyone that denies this should go commit suicide immediately because we have enough idiots on this earth already.  So the government comes up with different scores and in many cases, simply gives a waiver or exemption to blacks.  

So in every case, 100% of the time, when a moron doesn't like labels it is because they do not like their own label.  Maybe their father is a child molester.  Or maybe one of their daughters is a whore.  Or maybe they have the label of lazy, uneducated, drunkard, pot head, liberal bitch.  

Just imagine how much better life would be if everyone had labels.  There would never be fraud or scams because their label would be scammer or fraudster or liar, etc.  

There are only 2 types of people on this earth.  Good and evil.  Good people are willing to get a job and work for things.  Evil people want welfare, food stamps, etc.  Sometimes good people have hard times and need help but this should be from people that volunteer to help like churches, family, and friends.  Anytime I am forced to be charitable, I want to go kill someone in the government that took away my freedom to choose who I will help.

Obama Care is evil because it forces and takes away freedom.  Why should healthy people be forced to pay medical bills for alcoholic, obese, drug addicted, idiots?  

So, every time some jerk wants to take away your freedom, remember that if you kill them, it is in self defense and a good thing.  When someone wants us to eliminate labels so we will not know what things really are, we should recommend that these people do the world a favor and kill themselves as soon as possible.  

Just like women libbers are obese, ugly, stinky women that no man would ever want anyway, so too are liberals that want to remove labels evil, satanic, freaks that are simply a disgrace to the human race.

Remember that calling a fag or queer a gay does not make the person any less a freak.  Changing words to mean something else is simply evil.  When evil people call abortion a freedom of choice, it is no less premeditated murder of a child.

So lets hope all liberals commit suicide tonight and have a wonderful life with lots of labels.