Now is the time to choose

Freedom

Freedom is not only the most important thing on earth, it is the most important thing to God and every universe that He created and every living thing including the infinite and beyond.


A computer can do massive amounts of calculations in a single second, but is bound by an instruction set that limits it's freedom to “think out of the box”. That is, it has to follow the rules and can not arbitrarily decide to do things a different way. The computer, therefore, can not be creative. It can only do things that have been preprogrammed.


Creating life is a complicated process that man as yet has not accomplished. Man together with woman can create a physical body, but the spirit comes from somewhere else. God has granted man the capability to procreate and set certain guidelines, which unlike a computer, man has the ability to break the rules, and do something else. This is called freedom.


Freedom is a very important thing. In fact, it is the subject of the biggest and longest and most decisive war in the infinite worlds of God and all of His creations. There is no other thing as important in all of infinity than freedom. There never has been and there never will be. Ever, because it is not possible, even for God to create anything as important as freedom. For freedom to even exist, there must be choices. If there are no choices, then it is like a train on a track. The train can not choose to go somewhere other than the track. Choices mean opposition in all things.


When the spirits that God had created or assembled, or caused to be, or however this was done, had achieved a level of intelligence that was literally out of this world, it became time to advance to the next level. The physical level would allow feelings, touch, and other senses and things that would bring the spirits closer to a state of Godhood. The human experience would necessarily have to be a temporary one, because freedom would be involved. Like the Constitutional Republic form of government of the United States, it only works if the government is comprised of good and honest people. Freedom can not be maintained by evil forces. This meant that it would be necessary for humans to die. Humans are evil by nature and can not be trusted with the power of either freedom or procreation for any extended period of time. It is far too dangerous. It would be like putting a wolf in charge of the chickens.


But many of the spirits could be trusted with both freedom and procreation. Even for eternity. The test is to see which ones.


God presented His plan to his spirit children. Freedom and procreation are so important and powerful things that they can not be trusted to the evil, wicked, or social minded. Putting these most valuable attributes in the hands of those not worthy of such, would be like placing a fully automatic machine gun, loaded with an unlimited amount of bullets, into the hands of an infant, so that if the child pulled the trigger, millions of people would be killed in a matter of just a few moments. The consequences of such would be far too great. There would need to be a test. It would be necessary to erase the memories of all participants before their entering the testing area because if not, they would all pass the test for sure, since they would know what it was all about. Then, those that passed the test could be given the power of freedom and procreation.


Lucifer suggested that by removing a few freedoms, he could guarantee that all would pass the test.


Jesus pointed out that losing freedoms was never a good choice and that only wicked and vile democrats and socialists would ever even suggest such a stupid idea.


Lucifer gained favor with a third of the population assembled by stating he would take care of them and offer such things as welfare, food stamps, even Obummercare. He would even see to it that an evil man named Roosevelt would create a new deal that took money from the productive and gave it to the slothful. A third of the congregation were fooled by the silver tongue of the evil one!


Jesus explained that freedom was more precious than anything ever imaginable. For without freedom, we would be on a train track and not in charge of our own destiny. He pointed out that social programs were for churches and charitable organizations and not for government. A third of the spirits could see the truth in what Jesus said.


So, there was a third for Lucifer and his democratic social programs and a third for freedom. This left a third that was undecided. You might say the undecided were not the brightest bulbs in heaven. This meant there were a third lazy and evil, a third benevolent and confident, and a third kind of like Africans that couldn't care less about anything as long as they could have free sex and dig bugs out of trees to eat.


So God kicked all of the democrats out of heaven forever and was so incredibly pissed off at them and their idiotic social program ideas that he even removed their ability to change their mind, or repent, or even participate in the human experience at all, except as demons, liars, and destroyers of anything good. Forever and for all eternity, these morons would never have a body, never procreate, and never achieve Godhood and the ability to have the freedom of choice for all eternity.


God gave the benefit of the doubt to the less bright and did allow them to participate in the test, but with limitations. They would have every opportunity to pass the test and could participate in Godhood if they achieved it.


The best spirits would come to earth or their designated planet and be born into circumstances that were designed specifically for them based on their past performance. There was to be no random chance as to be born white or black, rich or poor. There would be good come from every walk in life and even queers could become rock stars and blacks could become presidents.


Whether people believe this or not does not make it any less so.


Thomas Jefferson and Benjamen Franklin have stated these truths and as a result, the evil school administrators have removed their books from school shelves.


We were given the Bible and other written testimony like the Dead Sea Scrolls. We have the ability to choose. Many will make bad choices and that is the purpose of the test, to determine who loves freedom and is willing to fight for it and who are lazy worthless pieces of shit that are willing to give up a little freedom to have a little security.


There will not be a single democrat in the higher degrees of heaven where freedom and procreation are unlimited. These vermin will not be allowed families or the ability to create worlds and children without end.


Democrats are the lowest life forms as they spread their filthy lies and do their best to destroy freedoms for everyone. Fortunately, they will get their reward.


While it may seem that all good people should rip the heads off every democrat and urinate down their throat tube, and they certainly do deserve it, and the world would be a much better place for it, but it would deprive the evil pricks from committing the vile acts that will condemn them to hell forever. And when it is all said and done, and we are in our infinite glory, they will wish that they could be where we are and would gladly be urinated on if that would help, but it won't.

25 things every American should know about Obama and his evil intentions and war with Syria

1. Barack Obama, during an interview with Charlie Savage on December 20, 2007: "The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation."

2. Joe Biden, during a television interview in 2007: "The president has no constitutional authority ... to take this nation to war ... unless we're attacked or unless there is proof we are about to be attacked. And if he does, if he does, I would move to impeach him."

3. U.S. Representative Ted Poe: "Mr. President, you must call Congress back from recess immediately to take a vote on a military strike on Syria. Assad may have crossed a red line but that does not give you the authority to redline the Constitution."

4. U.S. Representative Kurt Schrader: "I see no convincing evidence that this is an imminent threat to the United States of America."

5. U.S. Representative Barbara Lee: "While we understand that as commander-in-chief you have a constitutional obligation to protect our national interests from direct attack, Congress has the constitutional obligation and power to approve military force, even if the United States or its direct interests (such as its embassies) have not been attacked or threatened with an attack."

6. The New York Times: "American officials said Wednesday there was no 'smoking gun' that directly links President Bashar al-Assad to the attack, and they tried to lower expectations about the public intelligence presentation."

7. U.S. Senator Rand Paul: "The war in Syria has no clear national security connection to the United States and victory by either side will not necessarily bring in to power people friendly to the United States."

8. U.S. Senator Tim Kaine: "I definitely believe there needs to be a vote."

9. Donald Rumsfeld: "There really hasn’t been any indication from the administration as to what our national interest is with respect to this particular situation."

10. Robert Fisk: "If Barack Obama decides to attack the Syrian regime, he has ensured – for the very first time in history – that the United States will be on the same side as al-Qa’ida."

11. Former congressman Dennis Kucinich: "So what, we’re about to become al-Qaeda’s air force now?"

12. Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Muallem: "We have two options: either to surrender, or to defend ourselves with the means at our disposal. The second choice is the best: we will defend ourselves."

13. A Syrian Army officer: "We have more than 8,000 suicide martyrs within the Syrian army, ready to carry out martyrdom operations at any moment to stop the Americans and the British. I myself am ready to blow myself up against US aircraft carriers to stop them attacking Syria and its people."

14. Khalaf Muftah, a senior Ba'ath Party official: "We have strategic weapons and we’re capable of responding."

15. An anonymous senior Hezbollah source: "A large-scale Western strike on Syria will plunge Lebanon virtually and immediately into the inferno of a war with Israel."

16. Ali Larjiani, the speaker of the Iranian parliament: "...the country which has been destroyed by the terrorists during the past two years will not sustain so much damage as the warmongers will receive in this war."

17. Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei: "Starting this fire will be like a spark in a large store of gunpowder, with unclear and unspecified outcomes and consequences"



18. General Mohammad Ali Jafari, chief of Iran's Revolutionary Guards: (an attack on Syria) "means the immediate destruction of Israel."

19. Israeli President Shimon Peres: "Israel is not and has not been involved in the civil war in Syria, but if they try to hurt us, we will respond with full force."

20. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu: "We are not part of the civil war in Syria, but if we identify any attempt whatsoever to harm us, we will respond and we will respond in strength."

21. The Jerusalem Post: "The lines between Hezbollah and the Syrian regime are so blurred that Israel will hold Damascus responsible if Hezbollah bombards Israel in the coming days, Israeli officials indicated on Wednesday."

22. Ron Paul: "The danger of escalation with Russia is very high"

23. Pat Buchanan: "The sole beneficiary of this apparent use of poison gas against civilians in rebel-held territory appears to be the rebels, who have long sought to have us come in and fight their war."

24. Retired U.S. General James Mattis: "We have no moral obligation to do the impossible and harm our children’s future because we think we just have to do something."

25. Syrian refugee Um Ahmad: "Isn't it enough, all the violence and fighting that we already have in the country, now America wants to bomb us, too?"

U.S. Army Buys Nearly 600,000 Soviet AK-47 Magazines

Each fully loaded, magazines combined hold almost 18,000,000 rounds.
Kit Daniels
Infowars.com
August 16, 2013

The U.S. Army is buying almost 600,000 Soviet AK-47 magazines, enough to hold nearly 18,000,000 rounds of 7.62x39mm ammo which is not standard-issue for either the U.S. military or NATO.

All the magazines combined weigh more than the operating weight of a C-5 Galaxy. Credit: USAF

A U.S. Army solicitation on the Federal Business Opportunities site asks for approximately 592,825 new AK 30-round magazines.
The solicitation even refers to the magazines as being for “non-standard weapons.”
More specifically, they are for the AK-47 designed by the Soviet Union at the start of the Cold War, which is now commonly used by opposition forces in proxy wars around the world.
This magazine order is an astronomical amount.
Assuming an individual, unloaded magazine weight of 0.95 pounds, all of these magazines combined weigh more than the operating weight of a Lockheed Martin C-5 Galaxy, one of the largest aircraft in the world.
The C-5 Galaxy wouldn’t even be able to carry all of these magazines. Two trips would be necessary.
To put it in another perspective, all these magazines combined weigh more than seven 18-wheelers each carrying the maximum legal load of 8,000 pounds.
The U.S. Army Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center (ARDEC) made the request for the immense amount of magazines, which seems excessive for only research and development purposes.
Chances are these magazines will end up in one of the numerous conflicts around the world.
This isn’t the first time that the federal government has made massive bulk purchases of guns, gun parts, and ammunition which are extremely popular with private gun owners but not in NATO use.
Last month, we reported that the army bought 2,550,000 live rounds of 7.62x39mm ammo.
The army is storing a portion of the ammo at Camp Stanley in Boerne, Texas, which is also supposedly a CIA outpost.
The Obama-backed Syria rebels could definitely use the 7.62x39mm for their AKs, especially considering that Congress has already cleared the CIA to openly ship munitions to them.
In 2012, ARDEC looked for a vendor who could “reach around the world at any given moment to gather and provide multiple types of weapons and weapon parts.”
The weapons requested included both foreign non-standard and obsolete U.S. military weapons, such as the aforementioned AK-47, 1911s and M1903 Springfields.
Expect to see even more large orders for “non-standard” ammunition in the future.
Below is a video on AK-47 magazines:

This article was posted: Friday, August 16, 2013 at 10:57 am

Political correctness in America -- the streamlining of evil

 

 

 

 

By Michael Bresciani
The primary thrust of political correctness is the elimination of offensive or contrary speech that may offend, or point out particular behaviors, casting them in an unfavorable light. It is like the old communistic effort of the KGB to silence all speech against the state, but in today's PC it is a voluntary program that you are not forced to obey – but woe to you if you don't!

It is the acceptable form of collective dishonesty that seems to protect everyone, while it suggests that doing, seeing or promoting sin or bad behavior is not wrong – only talking about it is wrong.

Political correctness is a societal perversion parading as an effort toward civility and world peace. In fact it is a bulldozer sent to level all resistance by labeling free speech and honesty as evil. It is one of the greatest evils of our time masquerading as a knight in shining armor.

PC is the little white fences and chutes that the sheep travel through, deliberately driven in fear by the calls and pokes of the herders who are leading them directly to the place of slaughter.

It is the literal and virtual fulfillment of a moral decay that was spoken of many years ago by the great prophet Isaiah.

"Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!" (Isa 5: 20)

PC is so perfectly perverted that it actually passes itself off as philanthropic love in action. In actuality it has segregated entire segments of society – moralists, the church and anyone with half a brain left to them, and has delivered them to the PC lords to be ostracized, criticized and generally disdained.

The Decline of Definitions always precedes the Decline of Morality

The Bible breaks the definition of love into three major categories. One is physical 'eros' the next is brotherly love 'philia,' and the last is 'agape,' which is unconditional love.

The common definition of love used in today's world is eros or physical love. It is feely, touchy and sloppy love, but it is at the bottom of the list of definitions.

Christ not only provided us with the greatest definition of all time but he capped it with an actual demonstration of that love in his death on the cross for sinners.

Jesus said, "Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends." (Jn 15: 13)

We have deluded ourselves into thing that it is not laying down our lives for mankind but it merely lying down with mankind that is the greatest love.

We have decided that kindergarteners must be taught about sex, high-schoolers must be given free condoms and college students should be able to drink themselves into oblivion while having sex with anyone or anything that moves. And the government should pave the way to do this, via funding for contraceptives and abortifacients.

Prophecy and Political Correctness are Natural Enemies

With physical love (eros) being the most widely accepted form of love in today's society how can things go wrong? Sexual freedoms have capitulated to the top of the list on everyone's agenda. Lying around with any gender at any time night or day is the new freedom for this generation.

In truth, the only thing that is being freed up is human hormones in a world where hatred is rampant, murder and mayhem are in the streets and nations are rising against nation with threats of terrorism and nuclear missiles.

Have we chosen the wrong definition? Has the PC that allows for unbridled sexual pursuits deceived us?

Was Christ's prophecy about the conditions of mankind in the last days incorrect or an extravagant exaggeration?

While describing the warfare and unrest that would mark the last day's generation Jesus said:

"And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold." (Mt 24: 12)

In this generation of unbridled sexual immorality this prophecy, no doubt, has nothing to do with eros.

Can no one see that it is the absence of the other kinds of love that is driving this world toward Armageddon?

PC says if you do see it – be sure not to say it!

Political Correctness has its own Priests and Prophets

The halls of academia, the liberal progressive media, Hollywood and the general consensus drawn from those who repeat today's 'common wisdom of the day' are the priests and prophets of PC.

They are priests from the temple of fleshly lusts and prophets of self-indulgence. They are honored and referred to at every turn in the modern drive to destruction.

When Bill O'Reilly made his plea to America to come up with an argument against gay marriage that was not derived from the Bible and ordinary 'Bible thumping' we can only surmise that he was referring to some academic, psychologist, politician or public figure whose own wisdom would put the matter to rest once and for all.

A barrage of answers came from writers and others, including this writer, but as yet Mr. O'Reilly has not acknowledged them and has continued to express his own PC version of the need for 'equality' to rise above the command of biblical morality, natural law and common sense.

One evangelist, Bill Keller, offered $10,000 to O'Reilly's favorite charity if he would openly debate the matter with Keller.

Those who fully recognize the infallibility of the Word of God should not offer him a nickel to dispute any part of this hyper-nonsense. Putting PC against the commands of a Holy God is like asking dogs in heat to explain the meaning of the Greek word 'agape.'

Three Stages of PC – Now Entering Stage Two – What's Next?

Stage one, as mentioned, is the voluntary collective acceptance of regulated speech. The first stage is an attempt to filter out responsibility for our worst behaviors by just being silent about them.

We must not use words, like perversion or sin, no visuals like pictures of aborted babies in pools of blood. The voluntary absence of these words must then be followed by actively condemning those who dare to cross the unseen PC line.

Stage two, is to bring the law to bear and make all non PC approved speech punishable by fines and imprisonment. Canada and some European countries have already started down that road and it is clear that America is entertaining the idea.

Stage three, is made clear by asking a single question about a bible prophecy spoken by Christ, to John, who gave us the book of Revelation while exiled to the isle of Patmos.

The prophecy is this: "And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God..." (Rev 20: 4a)

The question is this: What will these people die for, why will they be violently removed from the last day's scene?

The answer is simple: This is the third stage of the great scourge we now call PC. It is where those who will not concede to the filth of man's last day's romance with every whim of the flesh, including same sex marriage, will be forcibly taken out of the picture – completely.

It is why all the so called 'great religions' may be tolerated with the exception of one – true biblical Christianity.

The Supreme Court Vs. The Supreme Judge – A Non-PC Prophecy You Can Count On

America has lots of pros and cons about her past and her future. Setting the details aside for clarities sake we will put her best attributes together to create a reasonable chronology or timeline by which to gauge our future. In general there are four distinct stages. We are better than midway through them all and we are not doing well.

It must be noted that these things can be altered by us if we choose to do so, however, if the trends are any indication, at this moment it seems we are not moving to change course.

1. The fall into immorality has many facets, the sexual revolution, the pill, godless academia, but the most evil aspect of modern America's fall is clearly our 40 year-long slaughter of our own unborn. We have failed this test and as yet we have implemented no permanent remedy.

2. The general acceptance of homosexuality and other perversions has marked the second stage on our journey to the land of full reprobation. (Ro 1: 26-28)

3. Stage three is looming and seemingly rests in the hands of the same governing body that gave us Roe V. Wade and the sixty million aborted human beings that followed. Same sex marriage may be decided by the Supreme Court, but it will be judged by the Supreme Judge.

How will it be judged? It will no doubt lead us closer to the full and complete demise of our power as a nation. This is a biblically based, forgone conclusion and you needn't ask Bill O'Reilly if it is a sufficient argument.

4. Stage four is how we respond to Israel. Put simply, if we give up active support and defense, if needed, for Israel, we will have absolutely nothing left to present to God. Our fall will be complete and the concomitant results will follow.

To the O'Reillys' of this world, no argument will ever do, but let's not pretend that one has never been made. It is the life, words and sacrificial death of Jesus Christ for the sins of this world and his subsequent resurrection from the dead. This is the greatest argument of all time. Yet, for some, even this, – is not enough.

"And he said unto him, if they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead." (Lk 16: 31)

In the last days the prophet Daniel said that some people will be assuaged by mere flatteries to abandon the faith along with biblical morality. (Da 11: 32) If some of the Christians can do exploits as Daniel indicates, it follows that the rank and file Christians should at the very least – hold the line. If the bible is clear on issues like homosexuality, same sex marriage et al, then speak up, gently, lovingly, but affirmatively. But speak up!

It is not a prophecy we must heed in these last days, but a personal warning given to all believers by the Lord concerning his words and the teachings of his prophets and apostles – to wit:

"Whosoever therefore shall be ashamed of me and of my words in this adulterous and sinful generation; of him also shall the Son of man be ashamed, when he cometh in the glory of his Father with the holy angels." (Mt 8: 38)

As a final word of advice to the Body of Christ (the Church) we should be mindful that the admonition to be brave in the face of hostility to the gospel and all of biblical doctrine was made abundantly clear when the Apostle Paul said "Watch ye, stand fast in the faith, quit you like men, be strong." (1Cor 16: 13)

The Greek word for Quit in this passage is andrizo – it means 'to make a man of' or to 'play the man.' As we approach the difficult days close to the great tribulation period the call to be brave has never been more important.

Stand up, stand up for Jesus, the trumpet call obey;
Forth to the mighty conflict, in this His glorious day
Ye that are brave now serve Him against unnumbered foes;
Let courage rise with danger, and strength to strength oppose

Stand up, stand up for Jesus, the strife will not be long;
This day the noise of battle, the next the victor's song
To those who vanquish evil a crown of life shall be;
They with the King of Glory shall reign eternally

Stand Up, Stand Up for Jesus Geo. Duffield Jr. 1858

© Michael Bresciani

Nebraska school officials want boy named 'Hunter' to change his name

Liberals believe in creating institutions to solve problems.
Conservatives believe the individual is better at solving problems.
A 3 year-old deaf boy in Lincoln, Nebraska is being bullied by public school officials to change his name because the hand sign for Hunter Spanjer looks like a weapon. The Grand Island school district has a policy that forbids kids bringing to school "any instrument ... that looks like a weapon." They can't change the sign, because it's the official hand sign for his name, registered through S.E.E., Sign Exact English.
Pressure from the National Association of the Deaf and the public has compelled the district into allowing the deaf boy to keep his name. Sadly, there is no humility or sense of shame from district authorities.
The fight for the individual succeeded. The institution proved to be a gargantuan failure, and neither the district superintendent nor the school principal was fired.
An 8 year-old Baltimore student tries to chew his Pop-Tart into the shape of mountain. It looks more like a gun, so he says, "bang bang." Anne Arundel County authorities declare this to be an "inappropriate" use of his imagination and so they suspended him from school.
Neither the district superintendent nor the school principal was fired.
Kicking children out of school for harmlessly exercising creativity is what passes for education in a world where parents and teachers feel they have no influence on their local schools.
Just a few weeks ago, a seven-year-old Virginia boy was suspended for pretending a pencil was a gun at his Suffolk school. His father and neighbors were furious. Then the story went away. But not the education. What did the boy learn? He learned that admitting to doing something he didn't know was bad behavior will get you the maximum punishment. He learned that apologizing for doing something that he didn't know was bad behavior will get you the maximum punishment. He also learned that teachers and principals do not want to teach children that pencils can be dangerous. They want to teach you that using your imagination to pretend any object is a gun is punishable with exile from society. He learned that they use so-called "zero tolerance" laws to cold-heartedly deny children an education in favor of capitulation to the politically popular reaction of the day.
Neither the district superintendent nor the school principal was fired.
A second-grade teacher was suspended without pay in April, charged with possessing, carrying, storing or using a weapon for showing his students the proper ways to use tools. According to Washington Irving Elementary School officials, these deadly weapons included wrenches, pliers and screwdrivers. They were kept in a secured toolbox out of the children's reach.
Perhaps the Washington Irving Elementary School principal should hold an assembly during which she could deliver a PowerPoint presentation demonstrating how children should call police if they ever find an unattended wrench.
Sadly, neither the district superintendent nor the school principal was fired.
These institutional "solutions" to violence in schools are an obvious failure to everyone except the principals and superintendents who are delightfully relieved of their responsibilities to educate and consider the context of each student's behavior.
In this utopian liberal world, all carbon-based life forms are equally subservient to the draconian laws bequeathed from the holy sanctuaries of their state legislatures.
It's time to show zero tolerance for these small-minded, short-sighted bureaucrats infesting your public schools.
In the real world, we parents need to exercise our rights and duty by protesting, lobbying and forcing the firings or resignations of principals and superintendents (not teachers) around the country who use these zero tolerance laws as a weapon against imagination and an excuse for avoiding the difficult job of actually getting to know each student and properly guiding and directing them toward learning.
-----
© Copyright 2013 Rick Jensen, distributed exclusively by Cagle Cartoons newspaper syndicate. Rick Jensen is Delaware's Award-Winning Conservative Talk Show Host on 1150AM WDEL and 93.7FM HD3, Streaming live on WDEL.Com from 1pm — 4pm EST. Contact Rick at rick@wdel.com, or follow him on Twitter@JensenVoiceover

Obama: Half-black but all Democrat

By: Ann Coulter
10/24/2012 05:12 PM

RESIZE: AAA

Print294

New York can be a lonely and desolate city. My only date on this rainy Tuesday night is Chris Matthews — the last liberal left who will still talk to me about race. The rest of the Non-Fox Media are lying in wait, hoping I’ll disappear so they can revive the old chestnuts about racist Republicans again.
Among many such myths, there’s Reagan’s Philadelphia speech, George W. Bush’s speech at Bob Jones University, someone yelling “Kill him” at the mention of Barack Obama’s name at a Sarah Palin rally, tea partiers calling Rep. John Lewis the N-word, Scott Brown’s red pickup truck, dog whistles, code words, and on and on and on.
All of these myths are disproved in my book, “Mugged: Racial Demagoguery From the Seventies to Obama.” You should brush up on the facts because liberal lies never die. They just hide from the light like cockroaches and rush back out after dark.
Since my book came out, MSNBC, the Official Network for Racism Detection, has moved on from trying to convince black people that Republicans are promoting slavery and segregation to trying to convince women that Republicans plan to redefine rape and ban contraception.
Just two months ago, Lawrence O’Donnell was accusing Sen. Mitch McConnell of racism for saying Obama “has been working to earn a spot on the PGA Tour.” (What IS it about black people and golf? It’s such a dusty old stereotype!)
When most people think of golf, they think of the single whitest sport in the world, after polo. A few years ago, a PGA reference would have been made by Democrats only in order to sneer about elitist, country club Republicans.
But according to O’Donnell, McConnell was trying to align “the lifestyle of Tiger Woods with Barack Obama.” Liberals feel they have the right to say what symbols mean, which can change at will, according to circumstances.
These days, even O’Donnell is off the racism beat. He has been reduced to challenging Tagg Romney to a fight — from the safety of his television studio.

Only Chris Matthews is still on racism patrol. After the third presidential debate on Monday night, Matthews said that conservatives and “the white working class in the South” have a “racial hatred” for Obama. Why, Chris is so crazy about black people, he’s even considering hiring one someday to work on his show! Not yet, but soon.
Liberals always cry racism in moments of stress, so it’s understandable that Matthews would lash out. It must be very stressful seeing Obama go down in the polls even following the debates he allegedly won.
With the economy in the toilet and the Islamic world on fire, when Obama appears in person it’s even worse than if he were sleeping. That’s why — contrary to popular belief — the first debate was Obama’s best performance.
Perhaps if liberals hadn’t coddled Obama his entire life, giving him college acceptance letters, standing ovations and Nobel Peace prizes just for showing up, he would have been more prepared to debate someone a little more challenging than John McCain.
It’s hard to evaluate Matthews’ slander inasmuch as it contains no facts. But if it’s conservatives and “the white working class in the South” who are burning with racial hatred, why don’t white liberals ever vote for black representatives in their own congressional districts?
Black Democrats apparently can get elected to Congress only from majority black districts, whereas black Republicans are always elected from majority white districts: Gary Franks, J.C. Watts, Tim Scott, Allen West and (we hope!) Mia Love.
How come white liberals won’t vote for a black representative? Why can’t a black person represent Nita Lowey’s district?
Democrats do nothing for black Americans except mine them for votes, ginning them up with tall tales about racist Republicans. This week, a guest on MSNBC said that Republicans’ idea of foreign policy is to go to war with “one of those brown countries over there.”
This is in contradistinction to Obama, who simply wants to impoverish the brown people over here. Have you seen the black unemployment rates lately? (They’re hard to notice, since the NFM keeps them hidden in that vast warehouse with the Ark of the Covenant.)
The august New York Times recently explained that illegal immigration has no effect on unemployment because illegal immigrants compete only with “native-born workers without a high school diploma.”
As noted by Vanderbilt law professor Carol Swain, author of “Debate Immigration,” that means black workers. Illegal immigration, she says, harms blacks “the most because they’re disproportionately low-skilled.”
In liberals’ view, blacks don’t count. They aren’t — in the Times’ words — “the bulk of native workers.”
According to the Times, Obama’s black supporters were dismayed at a White House meeting last year when cards were passed out to campaign donors with talking points about how Obama had helped various groups. There were cards for women, Jews, gays and lesbians. But no talking points for how Obama had helped black Americans.
So Joe Biden tells a black audience that Romney wants to “put y’all back in chains,” and MSNBC hosts claim opposition to Obama’s re-election is based on “racial hatred,” and the Democrats believe their work is done.