Sunday, August 31, 2014

Why political correctness is so evil

http://www.wnd.com/2014/08/1-common-link-among-worlds-most-brutal-terrorists/

Radical Islam expert Brigitte Gabriel says ISIS is capable of anything from shopping-mall shooting sprees to nuclear attacks in the U.S. and believes the best way to ward off calamity is for Americans to wake up their elected officials and demand they “throw political correctness in the garbage can” and confront the radical threat as it truly exists.


Actually, Political Correctness and tolerance are among the most evil things on the earth.  For instance, we could stop black on white crime pretty quick by becoming intolerant and killing the lazy, welfare recipient, parasites wherever we find them.  Likewise, we never should have quit calling blacks, niggers, until they first stop calling themselves niggers.  

Instead of being mamsy pamsy pansies, we should treat blacks like the niggers they are until they begin to act differently. 

Saturday, August 30, 2014

One man's peaceful visit to Idaho

https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t300944/

Let me tell you what a great time I recently had in Idaho! I flew from near my home to Spokane and rented a car for my time in North Idaho.

One of the first and most obvious differences of life in an all-White area came at the gas pump. In "multi-cultural paradise", one must pre-pay for all gas. That's because of all the filthy subhumans who drive-off, without paying, after they fill their tanks. That practice raises the price, nationwide. In North Idaho, there is no need for the pre-pay system, because (like everywhere else) the vast majority of Whites are law abiding. It simply isn't a problem there. I spent a good chunk of my first full day in the company of Contact #1 and enjoyed myself immensely! We went to a great restaurant, where I ate a delicious elk steak with mushroom gravy. The restaurant had a huge buffalo head mounted on the wall, along with the heads of deer, elk and other examples of Idaho wildlife. After that, I spent a few hours talking with Contact #1 and enjoying the sights and smells of North Idaho. There wasn't much in the way of sound, compared to all the noise one would associate with a large city. That was just fine with me.

After my visit with Contact #1 concluded, it was late afternoon. I then decided to make the relaxing and refreshing drive from the Coeur D'Alene area north to Sandpoint. The drive consists of forty-five miles of beautiful scenery. One pine-covered mountain, after another. I saw a herd of buffalo grazing near their ranch. I shared the road with huge lumber trucks, carrying the trunks of huge trees that would never be missed, where so many remained. I saw a bald eagle in flight, along that stretch, last year. Just outside of Sandpoint, I crossed a bridge spanning two miles over the juncture of the Pend Oreille (pronounced "pond-o-ray") River and Lake Pend Oreille. The lake glistened, as the sun began its descent. I drove and walked around Sandpoint for about an hour, before making the trip back to Coeur D'Alene. I grabbed a quick dinner, returned to my hotel and went to bed, feeling blissfully content.

The next day, I made the same drive and continued beyond Sandpoint, east to Clark Fork and then a few miles into Montana (just so I could say I've been there). The drive from Sandpoint to Clark Fork contains scenery even more spectacular than that which exists between Couer D'Alene and Sandpoint. Mile after mile of mountains and the massive Lake Pend Oreille. A few of the mountains consisted of jagged gray rock, but most were covered in pine trees. Some of the mountains were capped with snow.

I felt a year's worth of stress dissipate, as I made that drive. However, my feelings of decompression were augmented by a sense of "survivor's guilt", as I reflected upon all of the recently murdered Whites whose names had been added to cemetery headstones (more than a few of which were also added to the memorial wall honoring fallen law enforcement officers). I mentally superimposed their faces upon the mountains and wished they could be sitting next to me, as I drove...

My final full day in North Idaho included another drive to Sandpoint, followed by a stroll through downtown Coeur D'Alene.

Every time I visit Idaho, I make a point of conducting a "chimp count". This trip, I only saw four monkoids in North Idaho. One day, I didn't see ANY!

I got a good night's sleep, woke up early the next day and drove my rental car back to the Spokane Airport. I then flew down to Boise and got checked into my hotel. Next, I hopped on a bus and went to the Boise Towne Square Mall. I walked a few blocks from the mall and had lunch at Hooters, where I was served by a great looking Aryan beauty. I returned to the mall and began to search for new Idaho souveneirs (as if anything would be new, after visits over the previous five years...).

It started to get late, so I returned to my hotel and watched TV. The news was boring, compared to where I live - no murders, no robberies. That's okay - I'm more than ready to be bored, in that sense!

The next morning, I was met by Contact #2 and his wife. We had a great breakfast in a fifties-themed restaurant and spent the rest of the day driving around the Greater Boise area. We visited a dam, overlooking a resivoir, and the view was awesome. We the drove up a winding road and I was surprised by the transition from high-desert terrain to green vegetation and finally, pine covered mountains outside of Boise. Contact #2 showed me a place where a very steep mountain rose to a height somewhere between three and eight hundred feet. It was like looking at a wall of pine trees and I absolutely loved it! We also visited Idaho City and it was great, too! During the drive, I was surprised to see a big black bear, lounging under a tree! We got back to Boise in the late afternoon and had dinner at Hooters. I'd enjoyed myself immensely! The next day, I strolled around downtown and went back to the mall (and Hooters).

If you have to live in a city, I strongly recommend Boise!

As my return flight climbed out of Boise, I looked down and saw the dam we had visited and the winding road we'd been on two days prior...

My chimp count in Boise reached twenty and, amazingly, the day I spent with Contact #2 and his wife, I didn't see any!

Seven days in Idaho and I only saw twenty-four of those disgusting creatures. And, let me tell you, they were very tame and well-behaved!

A few days after I got back home, I went to a suburban mall and conducted a chimp count. From the time I started, it only took me ten minutes and twenty-six seconds to count twenty-four. It was an unusually light day for them, at that mall.

I wish I could have stayed in Idaho! Someday, it will be my home...


.............14.............

Wednesday, August 27, 2014

Here is a Youtube of an illegal alien calling into a radio station and bragging about how much stuff she gets for free from the U.S. taxpayer and how she intends to receive welfare and food stamps for the rest of her life.

It is almost the ONLY reason that the scum from down south come to a country that they hate and intend to destroy.

http://youtu.be/-uLRCfLuP0A

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/-uLRCfLuP0A" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>



She, the caller, speaks English as a result of being born into this country from illegal aliens that were themselves lifelong parasites.

Maybe if non Americans were shot when they left the store after using food stamps, they would not be so quick to brag about being scum.

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

How corrupt is the FBI?

THE FBI's CONTROL OF THE FOURTH ESTATE

Postby msfreeh » Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:27 pm
Understanding how taxpayer funded FBI agents control the FBI Brand while controlling the corporate owned/run media.


Because of the groundbreaking work of Salt Lake City attorney Jesse Trentadue and Forensic Investigator Angela Clemente we now know 
a little more about the secret FBI Sensitive Informant/Top Echelon Informant programs. Yes that is plural.
see http://bobmccarty.com/2013/12/03/fbis-s ... -the-news/

Also see http://www.leagle.com/decision/In%20FDCO%2020140129A01




Taxpayer funded FBI agents have placed informants in low level to upper level management positions in radio,television and print media.
In place for over 60 years these informants provide the eyes and ears for the FBI Rapid Response Team set up to neutralize any negative press about the death squad activities of FBI agents.

This team has been successful in keeping the evidence out of the media of the FBI 's assassination of President Kennedy and Martin Luther King.
More recently the FBI has managed to cover up it's role in creating the 1993 1st World Trade Center bombing; Oklahoma City bombing; 911; Boston Marathon bombing; Omargh bombing in Ireland and the Mumbai Terrorist Attack in India .FBI agents also took the lead role in the coverup of the Lockerbie Plane bombing and the explosion of TWA Flight 800 over Long Island.

Some examples of the FBI control of media had the History Channel stop showing and selling it's documentary about the the FBI role in assassinating President Kennedy called THE GUILTY MEN see http://www.maryferrell.org/wiki/index.p ... ed_Kennedy

FBI agents created a media blackout of the 1999 trial in Memphis where a jury declared FBI agents had assassinated Martin Luther King see
http://archive.lewrockwell.com/spl2/mlk ... posed.html

The FBI has used your tax dime to hire broadcast journalists to maintain the FBI Brand 24/7.

Here is an example.

Dallas FBI Supervisor Lori Bailey was pulled over DUI driving the wrong way on the freeway.Nothing happened to her and the charges
were dropped. see http://www.ticklethewire.com/2009/09/11 ... guilty-to/


Prior to this event she had entrapped environmentalists in a group called Earth First to bomb power lines in the Arizona Desert
in FBI Operation Thermicon. http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/O ... 788970.php


In today's news FBI supervisor Lori Bailey is featured by the FBI Press Managers.........

see link for full story
http://eastfieldnews.com/2014/04/02/ext ... ng-flames/

EXTINGUISHING FLAMES
02 APR 2014 

Tami Kayea is a battalion chief with the Dallas Fire-Rescue Department.



Kayea was one of five women who spoke at Eastfield’s “Women of Courage” event on March 18, which was part of the college’s celebration of Women’s History Month.

The event also featured Eastfield student and U.S. Army Sgt. Krystal Lacey-Fuller, retired FBI agent Lori E. Bailey and two police officers from the TLC reality series, “Police Women of Dallas,” Police Sgt. Tracy Jones and police officer Yvette Gonzalez.

Thursday, August 14, 2014

The truth about the LDS Freedom Forum

There was a time when the LDSFF was an LDS Forum about freedom.  That is no longer the case and hasn't been for quite some time.  The creator of the forum, BrianM has crossed over to the dark side and now uses the site to recruit for his new church of the firstborn.  There are secret forums to discuss Denver Snuffer and other persons that have been excommunicated from the LDS Church.  True LDS members are not allowed to participate in the secret combinations within the secret forums.

One person that I know of has posted publicly about his experiences at LDSFF at:  http://megasatire.blogspot.com   His blogs are interesting and well written.  He defends his faith in the LDS Church and sometimes you have to read the entire blog before you see the satire, but he also has other blogs with deep doctrine that you can access from his satire blog.


Monday, June 9, 2014

Democracies always fail!

When the Founding Fathers of the United States wrote the Constitution, they wanted to make sure that the U.S. never became a democracy.  There are several reasons why there has never been or ever will be a successful democracy.  The most important reason is that democracies are evil by nature.  Mob rule is never a good idea.  Uninformed voters are hazardous the the freedom of people willing to research the issues.  Stupid people make stupid choices.  Lazy bums want a free lunch and can be bought with a welfare check.  The democratic platform is far more evil than the communist manifesto. 

Decline of the Empire says it better than I can:

Democracies Always Fail

Many Americans believe they live in a democracy. They don't. Yes, there are names on the ballot, campaigns are waged, votes are cast, and the winners serve their terms in Washington. But some votes count more than others. Way more. Those who vote with their checkbooks have far more sway than those who do nothing but push buttons or pull levers in a voting booth. The further you move away from the "one person, one vote" principle, the less of a democracy you have. Here in America we've moved a vast distance away from this ideal principle. That is especially evident this year now that we live in the Age of the Superpacs after the Citizens United decision.
Unfortunately, there is no good word to describe what we've got in the United States. We could call it an oligarchy, but that implies a concentration of power that doesn't exist. The elites who make the rules in America are a relatively large, diverse group. Power is widely and loosely distributed, although most of the power broking goes on in Washington, D.C.
But suppose we did live in a democracy in which all votes were equal. It would fail anyway scientists say, for People Aren't Smart Enough for Democracy to Flourish.
The democratic process relies on the assumption that citizens (the majority of them, at least) can recognize the best political candidate, or best policy idea, when they see it. But a growing body of research has revealed an unfortunate aspect of the human psyche that would seem to disprove this notion, and imply instead that democratic elections produce mediocre leadership and policies.
The research, led by David Dunning, a psychologist at Cornell University, shows that incompetent people are inherently unable to judge the competence of other people, or the quality of those people's ideas. For example, if people lack expertise on tax reform, it is very difficult for them to identify the candidates who are actual experts. They simply lack the mental tools needed to make meaningful judgments.
As a result, no amount of information or facts about political candidates can override the inherent inability of many voters to accurately evaluate them. On top of that, "very smart ideas are going to be hard for people to adopt, because most people don’t have the sophistication to recognize how good an idea is," Dunning told Life's Little Mysteries.
He and colleague Justin Kruger, formerly of Cornell and now of New York University, have demonstrated again and again that people are self-delusional when it comes to their own intellectual skills. Whether the researchers are testing people's ability to rate the funniness of jokes, the correctness of grammar, or even their own performance in a game of chess, the duo has found that people always assess their own performance as "above average" — even people who, when tested, actually perform at the very bottom of the pile. [Incompetent People Too Ignorant to Know It]
I have a lot more to say about people's competence to evaluate their own competence or the ideas of others, including mine, so I will return to that subject on Sunday. Let's stick with how their "lack of mental tools" affects democracy.
In an ideal democracy where "one person, one vote" actually holds, people's inability to judge ideas and issues would be a big problem. But we live in the Real World, not an ideal world. And the further away you move from an ideal democracy, the less rational the voting process becomes. Here in the United States, party allegiance and voting have become primarily emotional processes. And of course for candidates or those working directly for the political parties or those buying their allegiance, there's a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow.
The issues are unimportant, being merely emotional touchstones for uninformed voters. There's hardly anything rational about it for most of these dupes. The advent of Mass Media in the 20th century changed the game in a profound way. Emotional messages can now be disseminated far and wide in 30-second or 60-second spots on TV or radio. Certainly it is not possible to intelligently address a real issue (e.g. tax policy or government deficits) in such a short period of time. Soundbites, not rational thinking, govern the election process from beginning to end.
Thus these scientists have committed the fallacy I called the Imputation of Rationality in my post Humans Are Not Rational Problem Solvers. If that were all there is to it, we could conclude that democracies always fail because voters can not distinguish between a good idea and a bad idea.
The most incompetent among us serve as canaries in the coal mine signifying a larger quandary in the concept of democracy; truly ignorant people may be the worst judges of candidates and ideas, Dunning said, but we all suffer from a degree of blindness stemming from our own personal lack of expertise.
Mato Nagel, a sociologist in Germany, recently implemented Dunning and Kruger's theories by computer-simulating a democratic election. In his mathematical model of the election, he assumed that voters' own leadership skills were distributed on a bell curve — some were really good leaders, some, really bad, but most were mediocre — and that each voter was incapable of recognizing the leadership skills of a political candidate as being better than his or her own. When such an election was simulated, candidates whose leadership skills were only slightly better than average always won.
Nagel concluded that democracies rarely or never elect the best leaders. Their advantage over dictatorships or other forms of government is merely that they "effectively prevent lower-than-average candidates from becoming leaders."
As I pointed out above, the real problem is that ideal democracies do not exist. Clueless voters are a secondary issue. In fact, I would go much further. I would say that ideal or close-to-ideal democracies are inherently unstable and therefore must fail. They are unsustainable. The reason for this is simple: ideal democracies are incompatible with Human Nature, i.e. power corrupts, governing inherently requires humans to wield power, and thus the democratic process must become subverted at some point or other.
American democracy failed decades ago—we could argue about exactly when that occurred—but we are seeing that process at work in Europe today. Greece and Italy are now run by unelected bureaucrats in Brussels who, along with the ECB and big private banks, will increasingly call the shots in other countries on Europe's southern rim. Great power is being wielded and corruption is part & parcel of that. The governing process in EU member states is becoming more and more undemocratic every day. If you doubt this, just ask a Greek or an Italian. Next year you can ask the Portuguese or the Spanish.
So my view is that democracies always fail sooner or later. Although the United States never had a pure democracy, it is remarkable how long the old Republic was sustained. But when America became a great global power after World War II, the jig was up. It was only a matter of time until the U.S. became as undemocratic as it is today. What's ironic about this is that the less we live in a democracy, the more those looking to maintain the status quo trumpet the idea of America-as-a-democracy and the importance of voting. Frankly, that's ridiculous, and provides us with yet another example of how crazy life in the United States has become.
In psychological terms, this looks like the biggest case of overcompensation in human history. In the media it is totally unacceptable to call a spade a spade and admit we don't live in a democracy. It is taboo, verboten. When a subject is taboo, that's always a strong indicator that deep psychological forces (i.e. basic instincts or defense mechanisms) are in play.
Read the rest at: http://www.declineoftheempire.com/2012/03/democracies-always-fail.html

Thursday, June 5, 2014

FBI tracks iPhone users



The FBI in the palm of your hands

2012 10 31 gonzo.wordpress.com

With the release of iPhone 5 and its clear success, Apple is making great strides to entrench itself as the most widely used smartphone. What is surprising is that iPhone sales have been strong since release despite the fact that a few weeks prior, it was reported that the FBI may be tracking iPhone users.

According to various news outlets, 12 million iPhone and iPad device identifiers were swiped from an FBI computer by hackers associating themselves with the group Anonymous. Luckily for consumers the hack was meant to expose the tracking that was going on and not to compromise any individual accounts. To further credit this attack, the hackers posted one million unique identification numbers that were verified by a third party.

This begs the question, why is the FBI monitoring and tracking people via their iPhones? On what grounds is this legal? What starts to make things even stranger is the fact that almost a month after this story broke the FBI stated that Android phones, iPhone’s competition, are prone to malware and viruses. Why did the FBI specifically single out Android phones? This statement does give more credibility to the claims made by Anonymous. If the FBI had managed to hack iPhones or make a deal with Apple, it would be in their best interest to get everyone using an iPhone.

This doesn’t mean that people should rid themselves of their iPhones, but it does mean that a critical eye must be placed on the FBI and their actions. Monitoring what people spend their time doing is a step in the wrong direction; a step further from freedom. How can a person be free when their every move is scrutinized? How can someone express themselves when there is the possibility that every word they say, every action the take, can be twisted and used against them? The very technology that is suppose to allow us a new degree of freedom, bring us all closer together, can end up destroying the very foundations of liberty.

One can expect that the reasoning behind this blatant breach of constitutional rights will be to protect the country from terrorists or any other vague evil out there. How much more freedom will be lost to ensure our safety? The FBI has stayed quiet about this hack and the public seems to have grown apathetic.Benjamin Franklin said it best “they who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
Related articles
FBI hack yielded 12 million iPhone and iPad IDs, Anonymous claims (zdnet.com)
Hackers claim 12 mn Apple IDs from FBI – NEWS.com.au (news.com.au)
FBI Denies Hackers Claim To Have Retrieved Apple UDIDs From Computer (valuewalk.com)
12 million iPhone and iPad device IDs hacked from the FBI, Anonymous claims(nakedsecurity.sophos.com)